ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Genetic basis of resistance in hosts facing alternative infection strategies by a virulent bacterial pathogen.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Landscape Reveals Immunity Related Trade-Offs in an Invertebrate-Fungal Host-Parasite System.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Extreme Genetic Variability in a Parasite-Resistance Complex.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Having alternative infection routes is thought to help parasites circumvent host resistance, provided that these routes are associated with different host resistance loci. This study tests this postulate by examining whether alternate infection routes of the parasite Pasteuria ramosa are linked to distinct resistance loci in its crustacean host, Daphnia magna. We focus on the P. ramosa isolate P15, which can attach and penetrate the host through either the hindgut or the foregut. Using a global panel of 174 D. magna genotypes supplemented with breeding experiments, we analyzed resistance patterns for each of these infection routes. Our findings confirm our hypothesis in D. magna, hindgut attachment is determined by the D locus, while foregut attachment is controlled by a newly identified G locus. We established a gene model for the G locus that indicated Mendelian segregation and epistatic interaction with at least one other resistance locus for P. ramosa, the C locus. Using genomic Pool-sequencing data, we localized the G locus within a known Pasteuria Resistance Complex on chromosome 4 of D. magna, whereas the D locus is on chromosome 7. Two candidate genes for the G locus, belonging to the Glycosyltransferase gene family, were identified. Our study sheds new light on host-parasite coevolution and enhances our understanding of how parasites evolve infection strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.