Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707860›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2025

The Psychosocial Hierarchy of Controls: Effectively Reducing Psychosocial Hazards at Work.

Asta Kjærgaard, Emilie Marie Rudolf, Julie Palmqvist, Mikala Ernebjerg Jakobsen, Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen Ajslev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asta KjærgaardThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-2765-7326
Emilie Marie RudolfThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julie PalmqvistThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikala Ernebjerg JakobsenThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeppe Zielinski Nguyen AjslevThe National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Financial support was provided by The Danish Working Environment Authority.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychosocial hazards in the workplace contribute to mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and musculoskeletal ill-health. The Hierarchy of Controls applied to NIOSH Total Worker Health (TWH HOC) aims to mitigate these hazards through effective interventions. This study proposes a revision of the model resulting in a HOC for psychosocial hazards (P-HOC) and explores its application in improving the working environment.

methodsWe reviewed recent literature on organizational and individual interventions to revise the TWH HOC to a psychosocial HOC framework. Subsequently, the modified P-HOC was applied to a qualitative case study of nine Danish companies participating in the Danish "Agreement to problem-solve" labor inspection strategy. We analyzed the types of initiatives implemented and gathered qualitative data on employee and management perspectives on their effectiveness.

resultsThe study led to a revision of the TWH HOC resulting in a P-HOC prioritizing organizational measures with documented effect, and indicating the importance of comprehensive measures. Findings from the qualitative study indicate a predominant contemporary focus on lower-level P-HOC initiatives, such as individual-based approaches and administrative controls. While these interventions show some improvements in mental well-being and work culture, they seem insufficient to enhance the comprehensive psychosocial environment. Companies implementing higher-level interventions experienced greater efficacy, particularly when employing multifaceted approaches.

conclusionsThe study emphasizes the need for a more robust application of higher-level measures and multifaceted interventions to better improve the psychosocial working environment. Future research should investigate the P-HOC's varying impact and explore alternative frameworks for better intervention outcomes.

Indexed as

Occupational DiseasesOccupational HealthOccupational StressWorkplaceDenmarkHumansMental DisordersMusculoskeletal DiseasesNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.Organizational CultureQualitative ResearchUnited Stateshealth outcomeshierarchy of controlsmental healthoccupational safety and healthpsychosocial hazardspsychosocial working environmentworkplace interventions

Identifiers

PMID39707860
PMCPMC11834945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.