Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707735›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025

Australian preferences for influenza vaccine attributes and cost: A discrete choice experiment.

Simon Fifer, Lili Toh, Daniel Yu, Katherine Young, Jason Menche

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon FiferResearch, Community and Patient Preference Research (CaPPRe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5221-0067
Lili TohResearch, Community and Patient Preference Research (CaPPRe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1329-1076
Daniel YuMedical, CSL Seqirus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Katherine YoungMedical, CSL Seqirus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason MencheMedical, CSL Seqirus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People in Australia have access to different influenza vaccines, but may be unaware of their options and features. Preference studies for differentiated influenza vaccines including cell-based vaccines are limited, particularly in Australia. This study investigated which influenza vaccine attributes people in Australia value using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Adults in Australia ineligible for free influenza vaccines had been vaccinated in the last 5 years and intended to be vaccinated again completed an online survey. Participants (

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccinescell-based vaccinesdiscrete choice experimentinfluenza vaccine choicepatient preferencesSeasonal influenza

Identifiers

PMID39707735
PMCPMC12934172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.