ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2025
Non-viral gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis: progress and possibilities.
Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanocarrier-Based Gene Delivery Systems: Mechanisms, Clinical Translation, and Future Perspectives.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Review
- Anatomically Guided Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery in the Eye: Overcoming Barriers for Precision Gene Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Dual molecular diagnosis of CEP290 and GLI3 mutations identified in an infant with leber congenital amaurosis and postaxial polydactyly, a Bardet-Biedl syndrome phenocopy.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA) represents a set of rare and pervasive hereditary conditions of the retina that cause severe vision loss starting in early childhood. Targeted treatment intervention has become possible thanks to recent advances in understanding LCA genetic basis. While viral vectors have shown efficacy in gene delivery, they present challenges related to safety, low cargo capacity, and the potential for random genomic integration. Non-viral gene therapy is a safer and more flexible alternative to treating the underlying genetic mutation causing LCA. Non-viral gene delivery methods, such as inorganic nanoparticles, polymer-based delivery systems, and lipid-based nanoparticles, bypass the risks of immunogenicity and genomic integration, potentially offering a more versatile and personalized treatment for patients. This review explores the genetic background of LCA, emphasizing the mutations involved, and explores diverse non-viral gene delivery methods being developed. It also highlights recent studies on non-viral gene therapy for LCA in animal models and clinical trials. It presents future perspectives for gene therapy, including integrating emerging technologies like CRISPR-Cas9, interdisciplinary collaborations, personalized medicine, and ethical considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.