Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707698›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Non-daily contraception: Reinforcing the choice of users and addressing unmet needs of reproductive health.

Helena Kopp Kallner, Ingela Lindh, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helena Kopp KallnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-9165
Ingela LindhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0673-3841
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1444

Funding

Gedeon Richter
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite great societal efforts promoting female autonomy, Sweden still faces unmet contraceptive needs, with abortion rates being the highest in the Nordic countries. In this commentary, we discuss using non-daily contraception options to combat these unmet needs. Non-daily methods include transdermal (i.e., patch), ring, injectables, and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Numerous studies have revealed that users prefer non-daily methods, and studies implementing structured counseling have revealed an increase in non-daily methods. Relative to LARC, the patch and the ring are non-daily parenteral methods that offer the possibility for self-management. Ultimately, client-centered counseling and shared decision-making are crucial for increasing awareness of all methods and enhancing method utilization and adherence. Finally, dispelling myths surrounding reversible hormonal contraception is essential for empowering women to make informed choices and improving overall reproductive health outcomes.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorReproductive HealthFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionSwedencontraceptioncontraceptive patchLARCnon‐daily contraceptionringstructured counselingtransdermal contraception

Identifiers

PMID39707698
PMCPMC11782052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.