ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Application of large language models in clinical record correction: a comprehensive study on various retraining methods.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefits of Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Clinical Record Rubric Evaluation in Undergraduate Medical Education: Experimental Evaluation Study With Medical Faculty.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Memorization in large language models in medicine prevalence characteristics and implications.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs), specifically GPT-based (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) and Llama-2 models (13B and 7B architectures), in autonomously assessing clinical records (CRs) to enhance medical education and diagnostic skills. MATERIALS AND
methodsVarious techniques, including prompt engineering, fine-tuning (FT), and low-rank adaptation (LoRA), were implemented and compared on Llama-2 7B. These methods were assessed using prompts in both English and Spanish to determine their adaptability to different languages. Performance was benchmarked against GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama-2 13B.
resultsGPT-based models, particularly GPT-4, demonstrated promising performance closely aligned with specialist evaluations. Application of FT on Llama-2 7B improved text comprehension in Spanish, equating its performance to that of Llama-2 13B with English prompts. Low-rank adaptation significantly enhanced performance, surpassing GPT-3.5 results when combined with FT. This indicates LoRA's effectiveness in adapting open-source models for specific tasks. DISCUSSION: While GPT-4 showed superior performance, FT and LoRA on Llama-2 7B proved crucial in improving language comprehension and task-specific accuracy. Identified limitations highlight the need for further research.
conclusionThis study underscores the potential of LLMs in medical education, providing an innovative, effective approach to CR correction. Low-rank adaptation emerged as the most effective technique, enabling open-source models to perform on par with proprietary models. Future research should focus on overcoming current limitations to further improve model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.