ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2024
Analysis of topical conjunctival microbiotic cultures in patients treated with intravitreal injections using antibiotic prophylaxis with 0.3% ofloxacin eye drops.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy on Conjunctival Flora and Antibiotic Resistance in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- From Tears to Toxins: Mapping Antibiotic Passage Through the Eye-Liver Axis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravitreal injections, a relatively recent treatment in ophthalmology, is being adopted rapidly worldwide and becoming one of the most common therapies in the field. Numerous complications are associated with this treatment, ranging from minor inflammatory ailments to endophthalmitis. We analyzed the conjunctival flora of patients treated with intravitreal injections and topical antibiotics.
methodsThe study was a longitudinal prospective analysis of cultures and antibiograms collected from patients who underwent intravitreal injections and topical antibiotics afterwards at the retina clinic in ABC's Medical University.
resultsA total of 148 swabs obtained from 98 patients were cultured and underwent antibiotic sensitivity testing. All bacteria were sensitive to vancomycin, and with the exception of Escherichia coli samples, they were also sensitive to a third-generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone-same class and generation as ceftazidime), both of which are important antibiotics for the treatment of endophthalmitis. The bacteria species were specifically coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp. 92% of which was penicillin-resistant and 56.9% was resistant to ciprofloxacin, a second-generation fluoroquinolone. The culture results were similar to that described in the literature and showed the same higher prevalence of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp. and S. epidermidis. Regarding the antibiotic resistance profiles, vancomycin, a third-generation cephalosporin, and penicillin showed almost identical results to those reported previously. Regarding fluoroquinolones, the incidence of resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp. was lower than the findings worldwide, but the resistance rates found were: S. aureus (26.7%), S. epidermidis (61.3%), and Staphylococcus sp. (coagulase negative, 56.9%).
conclusionsThe current results showed that the typical conjunctival bacteria had higher resistance to fluoroquinolones (although they were not tested specifically to ofloxacin), suggesting a possible selection of resistant bacteria that should not be taken for granted in clinic. However, the same bacteria did not exhibit cross-resistance in the analysis of vancomycin and third-generation cephalosporins. This real-world, longitudinal, prospective study on conjunctival flora analyzed bacterial resistance profiles and contemporary antibiotic use, offering deeper insights into this subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.