ArticleMicrobiome2024
Complementary insights into gut viral genomes: a comparative benchmark of short- and long-read metagenomes using diverse assemblers and binners.
Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the biodiversity of large DNA viruses in intertidal mudflats via metagenomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Characterization and evaluation of a phage cocktail targeting Salmonella enterica in a Turkey farm.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Genome-resolved metagenomics from short-read sequencing data in the era of artificial intelligence.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Gut-Microbiome Interactions: Characterization, Therapeutic Implications and Machine Learning.Sage open pathologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetagenome-assembled viral genomes have significantly advanced the discovery and characterization of the human gut virome. However, we lack a comparative assessment of assembly tools on the efficacy of viral genome identification, particularly across next-generation sequencing (NGS) and third-generation sequencing (TGS) data.
resultsWe evaluated the efficiency of NGS, TGS, and hybrid assemblers for viral genome discovery using 95 viral-like particle (VLP)-enriched fecal samples sequenced on both Illumina and PacBio platforms. MEGAHIT, metaFlye, and hybridSPAdes emerged as the optimal choices for NGS, TGS, and hybrid datasets, respectively. Notably, these assemblers recovered distinct viral genomes, demonstrating a remarkable degree of complementarity. By combining individual assembler results, we expanded the total number of nonredundant high-quality viral genomes by 4.83 ~ 21.7-fold compared to individual assemblers. Among them, viral genomes from NGS and TGS data have the least overlap, indicating the impact of data type on viral genome recovery. We also evaluated four binning methods, finding that CONCOCT incorporated more unrelated contigs into the same bins, while MetaBAT2, AVAMB, and vRhyme balanced inclusiveness and taxonomic consistency within bins.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the challenges in metagenome-driven viral discovery, underscoring tool limitations. We advocate for combined use of multiple assemblers and sequencing technologies when feasible and highlight the urgent need for specialized tools tailored to gut virome assembly. This study contributes essential insights for advancing viral genome research in the context of gut metagenomics. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.