ArticleMicrobiome2024
Metabolic modelling uncovers the complex interplay between fungal probiotics, poultry microbiomes, and diet.
Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abundance and transmission of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes through mobile genetic elements in integrated chicken and fish farming system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metabolic modeling of host-microbe interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe search for alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production has increased interest in probiotics. However, the complexity of the interactions between probiotics, gut microbiome, and the host hinders the development of effective probiotic interventions. This study explores metabolic modelling to examine the possibility of designing informed probiotic interventions within poultry production.
resultsGenomic metabolic models of fungi were generated and simulated in the context of poultry gut microbial communities. The modelling approach correlated with short-chain fatty acid production, particularly in the caecum. Introducing fungi to poultry microbiomes resulted in strain-specific and diet-dependent effects on the gut microbiome. The impact of fungal probiotics on microbiome diversity and pathogen inhibition varied depending on the specific strain, resident microbiome composition, and host diet. This context-dependency highlights the need for tailored probiotic interventions that consider the unique characteristics of each poultry production environment.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of metabolic modelling to elucidate the complex interactions between probiotics, the gut microbiome, and diet in poultry. While the effects of specific fungal strains were found to be context-dependent, the approach itself provides a valuable tool for designing targeted probiotic interventions. By considering the specific characteristics of the host microbiome and dietary factors, this methodology could guide the deployment of effective probiotics in poultry production. However, the current work relies on computational predictions, and further in vivo validation studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of the identified probiotic candidates. Nonetheless, this study represents a significant step in using metabolic models to inform probiotic interventions in the poultry industry. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.