Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707509›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

The more random people's preference judgments are, the more they explore in gambling tasks.

Jianhong Zhu, Kentaro Katahira, Makoto Hirakawa, Takashi Nakao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jianhong ZhuGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-8524, Japan. zhujianhong1995@gmail.com.
Kentaro KatahiraHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8566, Japan.
Makoto HirakawaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-8524, Japan.
Takashi NakaoGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 739-8524, Japan.

Funding

Center of Innovation Program JPMJCE1311Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K03173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe decision-making process has been investigated separately in the context of externally guided decision-making (EDM, e.g., a gambling task) and internally guided decision-making (IDM, e.g., a preference judgment). In EDM situations, a predictable correct answer exists, and the value of the chosen item increases when positive feedback is received. On the contrary, in IDM situations, there is no objectively correct answer, and participants must decide based on their own internal criteria, such as preference or belief. In IDM, a choice-induced preference change occurs when the value of the chosen item increases and that of the rejected item decreases. However, since these two types of decision-making have been investigated separately, their relationship remains unclear.

methodsThe present study examined the consistency in an individual's tendency of decision-making reflected in the model parameters (i.e., learning rate and inverse temperature) between EDM and IDM. In this study, participants performed EDM and IDM tasks with different items.

resultsThe findings indicated that an individual's tendency with respect to how much value is reflected in decision-making (i.e., inverse temperature) between EDM and IDM is consistent. By contrast, no such consistency was observed for the degree of value change after a decision (i.e., the learning rate).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the close relationship between these two types of decision-making and offers a more comprehensive understanding of the human decision-making process.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGamblingJudgmentAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultComputational modelingDecision-making tendencyExternally guided decision-makingGambling taskInternally guided decision-makingPreference judgment

Identifiers

PMID39707509
PMCPMC11662857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.