ArticleBMC rheumatology2024
The role of C-reactive protein and genetic predisposition in the risk of psoriasis: results from a national prospective cohort.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Promising Approach to Psoriasis Vulgaris Management with N-Acetylcysteine and Vitamin E: Targeting the Interplay of Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Markers and Response to Biological Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsoriasis is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease associated with multiple factors. To evaluate the extent to which C-reactive protein (CRP) and genetic predisposition affect the incidence of psoriasis.
methodsThe cohort study retrieved 420,040 participants without psoriasis at baseline from the UK Biobank. Serum CRP was categorized into two levels: < 2 mg/L (normal) and ≥ 2 mg/L (elevated). The polygenic risk score (PRS) was used to estimate genetic predisposition, and was characterized as low, moderate and high PRS. The possible interaction and joint associations between CRP and PRS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsParticipants with high CRP levels had an increased risk of incident psoriasis compared to those with low CRP levels (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.18-1.34). Participants with high CRP levels and high PRS had the highest risk of incident psoriasis [2.24 (95% CI: 2.01, 2.49)], compared with those had low CRP levels and low PRS. Significant additive and multiplicative interaction were found between CRP and PRS in relation to the incidence of psoriasis.
conclusionsOur results suggest that higher CRP concentration may be associated with higher psoriasis incidence, with a more pronounced association observed in individuals with high PRS for psoriasis. So, clinicians should be aware that the risk of incident psoriasis may increase in general population with high CRP levels and high PRS, so that early investigation and intervention can be initiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.