ArticleBMC chemistry2024
Utilizing machine learning-based QSAR model to overcome standalone consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitors screening: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning insights into β-lactamase dynamics and resistance evolution.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- Integrating multi-structure covalent docking with machine-learning consensus scoring enhances potency ranking of human acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Computational Study of Enzyme Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Antioxidant activity at the molecular level: exploring ways of action and computational tools to investigate them.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Structure-activity insights and molecular modeling approaches of anti-TNBC agents: a comprehensive systematic review.Future science OA · 2025Review
- A dataset for machine learning-based QSAR models establishment to screen beta-lactamase inhibitors using the FARM -BIOMOL chemical library.BMC research notes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In virtual drug screening, consensus docking is a standard in-silico approach consisting of a combined result from optimized docking experiments, a minimum of two results combination. Therefore, consensus docking is subjected to a lower success rate than the best docking method due to its mathematical nature, an unavoidable limitation. This study aims to overcome this drawback via random forest, an ensemble machine learning model. First, in vitro beta-lactamase inhibitory screening was performed using an in-house chemical library. The in vitro results were later used as a validation. Consequently, we optimized docking protocols for AutoDock Vina and DOCK6 programs. With an appropriate scoring function, we found that DOCK6 could identify up to 70% of all active molecules, double the inappropriate. Further consensus analysis reduced the success rate to 50%. Simultaneously, a false positive rate was down to 16%, which was experimentally favorable for a drug search. Finally, we trained two quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models using logistic regression as a reference model and a random forest as a test model. After combining consensus docking results, random forest-based QSAR outperformed a logistic regression by restoring the success rate to 70% and maintaining a low false positive rate of around 21%. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefit of using a random forest (machine learning)-based QSAR model to overcome a standard consensus docking limitation in beta-lactamase inhibitor search as a proof-of-concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.