ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Long-term outcomes in thoracic aortic surgery: 11 year single centre experience.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections provide a complex surgical cohort termed thoracic aortic surgery. Regular follow-up at specialist clinics with cross-sectional imaging is recommended. Identifying risk factors that lead to re-operations as well as the requirement for and appropriate length of follow-up remain points of debate.
methodsPatients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery performed at a single centre from January 2012 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical information, operative details, histological reports, post-operative outcomes and follow up were collected from electronic patient records. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and R Studio.
results409 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study with a median follow-up of 3.8 years (IQR 1.6-7.6). The prevalence of all cause re-operations was 10.8% (n = 44). The median time to re-operation was 1.8 years. 68% of the reoperations occurred within the first 5 years. Multi and univariate logistic regression identified young age, arteritis and/or aortitis as the main risk factors associated with increased risk of re-operation. Connective tissue disease and systemic inflammatory diseases approached but didn't meet statistical significance. Bicuspid aortic valve pathology was associated with reduced risk of re-operation.
conclusionsPatients undergoing thoracic aortic surgery have a high rate of re-operation. The first 5 years represent a high-risk period and follow-up with cross-sectional imaging during that time by specialist aortic services is essential. Patient with aortitis remain at high risk and should be treated by appropriate by specialist aortic services with subspecialty interest and expertise on treating patients with aortitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.