ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2024
Disutility associated with social isolation and loneliness in Germany: results of a population survey using the EQ-5D-5L instrument.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association Between Loneliness and Hikikomori Symptoms. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial isolation and loneliness are highly prevalent and may have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The EQ-5D-5L is a widely used questionnaire from which an index value for HRQL based on societal preferences (utility) can be derived. The purpose of this study was to estimate the loss in utility (i.e. disutility) associated with loneliness and social isolation in the German adult population.
methodsData came from a quota sample of individuals aged 18-74 years residing in Germany (n = 5,000) and representing the adult population in terms of age groups, gender and geographic locations. Data collection was conducted online in August and September 2023 by a certified market research firm. The EQ-5D-5L index score based on the German value set was used as outcome. Moreover, the established Lubben Social Network Scale was used to measure social isolation. The De Jong Gierveld tool was used to quantify loneliness. Groups affected by social isolation or loneliness were compared to non-affected groups, respectively. Differences in covariates between affected and non-affected groups were balanced using entropy balancing. Linear regressions were conducted afterwards (using the weights derived from the entropy balancing). Subgroup analyses by sex and age groups as well as various robustness checks were conducted.
resultsThe EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with social isolation compared to individuals without social isolation (β=-0.04, p < 0.001). Moreover, the EQ-5D-5L index score was lower among individuals with loneliness compared to individuals without loneliness (β=-0.07, p < 0.001). Several robustness checks produced similar results. The findings were almost the same for both women and men and varied only slightly between age groups.
conclusionsWe found a statistically significant and relevant disutility associated with social isolation and, even more pronounced, with loneliness. The magnitude of disutilities is similar to those reported for various chronic diseases. Taking into account the high prevalence of social isolation and, in particular, loneliness, the associated burden in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) lost is likely to be tremendous. The results underline the need to take action against the high prevalence of loneliness and social isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.