ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Chronobiological variations of acute aortic dissection in a Northwest Chinese population.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of acute aortic dissection (AAD) has been gradually increasing in recent years. This study aimed to investigate the circadian variations of AAD onset in a northwest Chinese population and provide scientific insights for AAD prevention.
methodsThe clinical data of 1,145 AAD patients admitted to our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected, and the periodic features of AAD were analyzed.
resultsStanford type A and type B AAD were present in 58.43% (669 cases) and 41.57% (476 cases) of the patients, respectively. The incidence rate was highest in the winter (358 cases, 31.27%) and lowest in the summer (225 cases, 19.65%). AAD occurred at the highest rate between 19:00-24:00 (321 cases, 28.03%) and the lowest rate between 1:00-6:00 (247 cases, 21.57%). Stanford type A AAD was most prevalent in the winter and the least prevalent in the spring, whereas Stanford type B AAD was most prevalent in the winter and the least prevalent in the summer. The difference between type A and type B in seasonal distribution was significant in spring (χ
conclusionsAAD onset followed a chronobiological pattern in patients from northwest China, with winter and 19:00-24:00 being the peak season and time period of AAD occurrence, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.