ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024
Assessing hand motor function in chronic immune-mediated neuropathies: a proof-of-concept study using a data glove.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic immune-mediated neuropathies are clinically heterogeneous and require regular, objective, and multidimensional monitoring to individualize treatment. However, established outcome measures are insufficient regarding measurement quality criteria (e.g., reliability, objectivity) or functional relevance. Wearables such as data gloves might be helpful, allowing repeated quantification of complex everyday life-relevant motor function of the hand.
methods25 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or multifocal motor neuropathy were followed-up at five time points during maintenance therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin. 14 of them showed clinically relevant hand motor impairment. We examined the patients' hand function using a data glove which quantifies the active range of motion (ROM) of the hand based on three different movement patterns. In addition, clinical outcome parameters (grip strength measurement, MRC Sum Score, INCAT disability score), nerve conduction studies (NCS), and high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) were performed, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) like the Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) were assessed. We calculated correlation coefficients, performed Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, as well as correlation analyses for the glove data and clinical outcome parameters. Longitudinal analyses were based on a Linear Mixed Model, and we assessed construct validity of the data glove by analyzing correlations between the glove measurements and well-established clinical parameters.
resultsWe found good to excellent test-retest reliability for the ROM in all glove movement patterns (Intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.83-0.94), underlining the ability to capture clinical stability. Moreover, the glove demonstrated adequate, sensitivity and specificity in detecting hand motor impairment (area under the curve (AUC): 0.714-0.780), and it performed better than NCS and HRUS (AUC: 0.552/0.701). The AUC values for the metrically scaled parameters include: Vigorimeter (AUC: 0.929) and R-ODS (AUC: 0.698). Additionally, the data glove proved to be a valid tool, as we demonstrated moderate to strong, significant correlations between the glove and established clinical parameters (especially Vigorimeter), as well as PROMs (especially R-ODS).
conclusionsThis data glove allowed for a non-invasive assessment of the hand motor function and yielded investigator-independent results that reliably reflected individual functional deficits with relevance to everyday life. Future studies should explore the ability to predict clinically meaningful responses to immunomodulatory treatment and to support and monitor rehabilitation progress, with potential applications in other neurological diseases as well. Trial registration at the German Clinical Trials Register, Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS: 00027345), retrospectively registered on 23rd March 2022: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027345.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.