ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2024
Tracing the transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales at the patient: ward environmental nexus.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in Europe: Surveillance Challenges, Emerging Threats and Public Health Preparedness.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producingJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Comparison of Environmental Microbiomes, Resistomes and Plasmidomes from a Human Tertiary Hospital and Companion Animal Veterinary Hospital in London, UK.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The potential of the microbiome as a target for prevention and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionColonisation and infection with Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in healthcare settings poses significant risks, especially for vulnerable patients. Genomic analysis can be used to trace transmission routes, supporting antimicrobial stewardship and informing infection control strategies. Here we used genomic analysis to track the movement and transmission of CREs within clinical and environmental samples.
methods25 isolates were cultured from clinical patient samples or swabs, that tested positive for OXA-48-like variants using the NG-Test® CARBA-5 test and whole genome sequenced (WGS) using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). 158 swabs and 52 wastewater samples were collected from the ward environment. 60 isolates (matching clinical isolate genera; Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter and Escherichia) were isolated from the environmental samples using selective agar. Metagenomic sequencing was undertaken on 36 environmental wastewater and swab samples.
results21/25 (84%) clinical isolates had > 1 bla
conclusionsPotential for putative patient-patient and patient-ward transmission was shown. Metagenomic sampling needs optimization to improve sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.