Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707355›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Primary healthcare's carbon footprint and sustainable strategies to mitigate its contribution: a scoping review.

Stephen James Walsh, Aisling O'Leary, Colm Bergin, Sadhbh Lee, Áine Varley, Matthew Lynch

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen James WalshSchool of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland. stephenjwalsh@rcsi.ie.
Aisling O'LearySchool of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Colm BerginDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Sadhbh LeeIrish Doctors for the Environment, Nelson St., Dublin 7, Ireland.
Áine VarleyIrish Doctors for the Environment, Nelson St., Dublin 7, Ireland.
Matthew LynchSchool of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 22627AO1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe escalating climate crisis poses a significant threat to global public health. The healthcare sector, designed to protect human health is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and thus, a key driver of climate degradation. This paradox endangers both planetary and human health, making the decarbonization of healthcare, including primary care, critical. However, research on primary care's contribution to emissions and strategies for mitigation remains limited.

aimThis scoping review aimed to map how primary care contributes to healthcare's environmental footprint and determine contributing factors. Additionally, it sought to identify existing and innovative strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of primary healthcare.

methodsA comprehensive strategy was developed to systematically search both published databases and grey literature. Key terms were identified and employed in the exploration of relevant databases and internet search engines.

resultsAn initial search yielded 246 published articles and 25 grey literature sources. 14 additional articles were included following forward and backward searching of prominent authors and key articles. After screening and full-text review, 39 articles and 12 reports/toolkits were included. The majority of sources were opinion pieces, with limited quantitative, observational, or qualitative studies. Primary care's carbon footprint can be classified into clinical and non-clinical sources, with significant impacts from pharmaceuticals and inhaler propellant gases. Contributing factors include limited knowledge of emission sources, lack of awareness of sustainable practices, low prioritization of sustainability, barriers including ethical concerns and over-medicalization. Identified strategies to reduce emissions include decarbonization of patient care, increasing education and awareness, implementing non-clinical decarbonization efforts, and conducting more research to support sustainable initiatives. Developing metrics to track progress and securing policy supports to improve adoption and implementation were also highlighted as critical.

conclusionThe identification of sources of carbon hotspots in primary care is an essential precursor to enable the development of targeted decarbonization strategies. Decarbonizing primary care requires a multifaceted approach that addresses the underlying factors driving unsustainable practices. This would allow healthcare professionals to effectively balance the provision of high-quality patient care, while reducing their environmental impact, ultimately improving both human and planetary health.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintPrimary Health CareClimate ChangeGreenhouse GasesHumansGreenhouse GasesCarbon FootprintEnvironmentGreener HealthcareMitigationPrimary careSustainability

Identifiers

PMID39707355
PMCPMC11662503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.