ArticleBMC oral health2024
Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of zirconia with various yttria contents.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Thermal Plasma and Ho: YAG Laser Surface Conditioning: Effective Superior Alternatives to Sandblasting for 3Y-TZP Zirconia-Composite Repair Bonding.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Influence of Surface Treatments and Thermal Aging Duration on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia.Polymers · 2026Article
- In-vitro comparison of fracture resistance and failure patterns of endocrowns versus post-and-core restorations in maxillary central incisors with and without ferrule.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Analysis of the effect of artificial aging on the phase composition of zirconia dominated by the cubic and tetragonal phases with polished and glazed surfaces: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchieving a stable bond with zirconia requires mechanical and chemical bonding methods. Information regarding the optimal treatment method for zirconia with varying yttrium content is scarce. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of zirconia with various yttria contents. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 168 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were classified into 12 groups based on the surface treatment method, including airborne-particle abrasion (APA), selective infiltration etching (SIE), hot etching (HE), and control group with no treatment; and yttria contents including Zolid Zi (4.5-5.6 wt% yttrium), Zolid HT White (6.7-7.2 wt% yttrium), and Ceramill Zolid FX (9.15-9.55 wt% yttrium). The surface roughness (Ra and Rz) of the specimens and the shear bond strength was measured (α = 0.05).
resultsThe results indicated that the mean bond strength of all specimens was higher after different surface treatments compared to the control group, of which the APA method resulted in higher bonding strength in all kinds of zirconia than other methods (P < 0.05). In all types of zirconia, a significant difference was observed in surface roughness (Ra and Rz) resulting from various surface treatment methods (P < 0.001). Interaction of surface treatment methods and zirconia type significantly affected shear bond strength and surface roughness (P < 0.05).
conclusionAPA significantly enhanced shear bond strength and surface roughness across all zirconia types and yttria contents. The SIE and HE methods also showed promising results. Zolid Zi showed superior bond strength, whereas Zolid FX demonstrated reduced bond strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.