ArticleBMC public health2024
Machine learning algorithms that predict the risk of prostate cancer based on metabolic syndrome and sociodemographic characteristics: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Machine Learning Reveals the Association Between Gene Expression and Immune Infiltration in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Study From Single-Cell to Survival Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven the rapid increase in the prevalence of prostate cancer (PCa), identifying its risk factors and developing suitable risk prediction models has important implications for public health. We used machine learning (ML) approach to screen participants with high risk of PCa and, specifically, investigated whether participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS) exhibited an elevated PCa risk.
methodsA prospective cohort study was performed with 41,837 participants in South Korea. We predicted PCa based on MetS, its components, and sociodemographic factors using Cox proportional hazards and five ML models. Integrated Brier score (IBS) and C-index were used to assess model performance.
resultsA total of 210 incident PCa cases were identified. We found good calibration and discrimination for all models (C-index ≥ 0.800 and IBS = 0.01). Importantly, performance increased after excluding MetS and its components from the models; the highest C-index was 0.862 for survival support vector machine. In contrast, first-degree family history of PCa, alcohol consumption, age, and income were valuable for PCa prediction.
conclusionML models are an effective approach to develop prediction models for survival analysis. Furthermore, MetS and its components do not seem to influence PCa susceptibility, in contrast to first-degree family history of PCa, age, alcohol consumption, and income.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.