Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707337›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2024

Family medicine research: seizing the moment to advance the field.

Brad Wright, Aoife O'Connor, Erin P Fraher, Miguel Marino, Bianca K Frogner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Gender Differences in National Institutes of Health Funding for Family Medicine Faculty.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brad WrightDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, 915 Greene St, Ste 355, Columbia, SC, USA. brad_wright@sc.edu.
Aoife O'ConnorJohns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Erin P FraherDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Bianca K FrognerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a growing awareness that primary care is essential to an accessible, equitable, high-quality, cost-effective health care system, family medicine research remains woefully underdeveloped. The increased focus of both state and federal policy makers on primary care payment and care delivery models presents an opportunity for family medicine to redefine itself as an academically rigorous discipline at the forefront of generating evidence that improves patient care and population health while reducing costs. In a critical review of the literature, we identified five themes-leadership, funding, resources, team science, and departmental culture-that are integral to family medicine departments seeking to grow and expand their research capacity.

Indexed as

Family PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansLeadershipPrimary Health CareResearch Support as TopicHealth services researchInterdisciplinary researchOrganizational culturePrimary health careResearch support as topic

Identifiers

PMID39707337
PMCPMC11660879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.