ArticleBMC oral health2024
The importance of using interdental cleaning devices on prevention of tooth loss in an employee population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of combined oral hygiene devices for interproximal plaque removal: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTooth loss can lead to an increased risk of physical disease and a reduced quality of life. The current study investigated the association of the use of interdental cleaning devices with oral health outcomes such as tooth loss among employees as a healthier population.
methodTooth loss was determined as the main outcome in 2017 in a company employee population (n = 845, average age = 47.76 years old, and 25.09% of female). Using the data of dental health examinations in the past 5-years from 2017, the years of use of interdental brushes (IDB) and dental floss (DF) were examined. The Community Periodontal Index (CPI) as of 5-years ago was also examined. The impact of years of use of IDB and DF on tooth loss was analyzed by a logistic regression model in stratifying the subjects into two groups by the maximum CPI (0-2 of CPI [< 4 mm] and 3-4 of CPI [≥ 4 mm]) in all periodontium.
resultsIn the group of maximum CPI < 3, a multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of the use of DF for 4-5 years on tooth loss was 0.42 versus for 0-1 year (reference). In the group of maximum CPI ≥ 3, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of the use of IDB for 4-5 years was 0.38 versus for 0-1 year (reference).
conclusionA longer-term use of interdental cleaning devices could improve oral health outcomes in this population, while the impact could differ depending on the basis of periodontal status. These findings would be useful for making strategies for oral health promotion in healthier people as employees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.