ArticleBMC palliative care2024
Providing 'professionalism with compassion'; how the time for caring communication can improve experiences at the end-of-life at home, findings from a realist evaluation.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor many patients and caregivers, attending to dying and death at home will be a new and fearful experience. This research brings new evidence on the central support of the Rapid Response Service (RRS), provided to those who chose to die at home. RRS's are variable, although all seek to avoid unwanted hospital admissions and to respond flexibly to suit individual preferences for support. Staffed by specialist palliative and end-of-life care nurses, the RRS works alongside primary and acute care, but little is known on their impact.
methodsRealist evaluation is a theory driven approach which identifies patterns of generative causation; this approach ascertains what works, for who, why, and in what circumstances. In this study, initial theories were developed by the research team and subsequently tested through semi-structured realist interviews with patients, caregivers, RRS staff, and other health practitioners. Iterative rounds of data analysis were undertaken to tease out contexts, mechanisms and outcomes, testing and revising the theories, including the application of substantive theory. Finally, we produced refined programme theories (PTs) which provide the basis for wider application of findings.
resultsOverall, 36 participants contributed, and six areas of inquiry were developed. This paper sets out the data from one area, PT Skilled Communication. Several benefits arose from RRS staff having the time to talk to and with patients and caregivers: specifically, that this communication improved knowledge in a tailored and compassionate manner. These exchanges allayed fears and reduced uncertainty, improving confidence to care. This was particularly embedded in one RRS because of their holistic approach.
conclusionsSupporting death and dying at home is a novel and difficult experience for many; skilled communication, provided by specialist palliative care staff, can make a positive difference. Through their provision of compassionate support, RRS staff can help caregivers to recognise and respond to different symptoms and situations, reducing fear. By responding rapidly, only on request, they also meet individual preferences for contact. Together, this improves the opportunity for the last days and hours of life to be experienced, at home, in as affirmative a manner as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.