Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707275›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2024

Changes in spatial bodily pain distribution one year after benign hysterectomy with emphasis on prevalence and risk factors for de novo and persistent pelvic pain- a prospective longitudinal multicenter study.

Peter Lukas, Lena Nilsson, Ninnie Borendal Wodlin, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Preben Kjølhede

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01526668 (A Randomized Study Comparing Four Different Postoperative Follow-up Strategies for Improved Postoperative Recovery After Benign Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01526668 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Study Comparing Four Different Postoperative Follow-up Strategies for Improved Postoperative Recovery After Benign Hysterectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LinkoepingRan2011 to 2018Enrolled525ConditionsHysterectomy, Genital Diseases, Female, PainArmsFollow-up strategy, No contact after discharge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter LukasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, S-581 85, Sweden. Peter.Lukas@liu.se.
Lena NilssonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, S-581 85, Sweden.
Ninnie Borendal WodlinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, S-581 85, Sweden.
Lars Arendt-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Preben KjølhedeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, S-581 85, Sweden.

Funding

Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige FORSS-155141; FORSS-222211; FORSS-308441, and FORSS-387761Futurum - Akademin för Hälsa och Vård, Region Jönköpings läns FUTURUM-487481, and FUTURUM 579171Region Östergötland RÖ-200641, RÖ-276871, RÖ-356651, RÖ-448391, RÖ-540551, RÖ-607891, RÖ-699021, RÖ-794531, RÖ-931528, RÖ-936208, RÖ-968764, and RÖ-987412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objectives were to determine the prevalence of de novo and persistent pelvic pain after benign hysterectomy and to assess risk factors.

methodsA Swedish prospective multicenter study of 440 women undergoing benign hysterectomy was conducted between October 2011 and March 2017. Measures of pain, the spatial extent of bodily pain, and pain sensitivity were assessed using a self-reporting questionnaire, Margolis's patient pain drawing, and quantitative sensory testing of pain thresholds for pressure, heat, and cold, respectively. Quality of life was evaluated by EQ-5D-3L and SF-36. Psychological distress was assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scaleand the Stress-Coping Inventory. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors, and the outcome was presented as an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsPreoperatively, 18.0% of the women reported no bodily pain, 41.5% had pelvic pain, either as the only location (7.0%) or along with pain in other locations (34.5%), and 40.5% had non-pelvic pain only. Postoperatively, 6.2% developed de novo pelvic pain and 16.4% had persistent pelvic pain. De novo pelvic pain developed exclusively in women who preoperatively had non-pelvic pain only. Risk factors for de novo pelvic pain were a long hospital stay (aOR 1.50 (95%CI) 1.02-2.21)), high preoperative pain intensity (aOR 1.25 (95%CI 1.01-1.62)) and a high number of pain areas (aOR 1.15 (95%CI 1.05-1.27)), along with anxiety (aOR 10.61 (95%CI 1.84-61.03)) and low EQ-5D-3L health index (aOR 0.02 (95%CI 0.00-0.31)). Risk factors for persistent pelvic pain were lower age (aOR 0.89 (95%CI 0.81-0.97)), higher number of pain areas (aOR 1.08 (95%CI 1.02-1.14)), and a higher frequency of preoperative pain (aOR 12.75 (95%CI 2.24-72.66)).

conclusionAlthough hysterectomy appeared to be reasonably effective in curing pelvic pain, a non-negligible proportion of women developed de novo pelvic pain or had persistent pelvic pain. De novo pelvic pain seemed to affect only those who preoperatively had widespread bodily pain. Women at risk for de novo and persistent pelvic pain after hysterectomy could be identified preoperatively. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT01526668) on 01/27//2012.

Indexed as

HysterectomyPelvic PainAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainPrevalenceProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenHysterectomyPain thresholdsPelvic painRisk factorsSpread of bodily pain

Identifiers

PMID39707275
PMCPMC11662711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.