ArticleBMC surgery2024
Comparison of two different secondary rhinoplasties in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to analysis the nostril symmetry and nasal stability following secondary rhinoplasty performed with either nasal septal cartilage implantation (G1) or simple alar cartilage suspension and internal fixation (G2) in patients with unilateral secondary cleft nasal deformity.
methodsNostril and alar symmetry were analyzed retrospectively in 13 consecutive patients in G1 and 17 in G2. Assessment of three indexes was first performed using photogrammetric measurements of photographs at pre-operation(T1), 7 days after repair (T2), and at least 6 months after repair (T3). The ratio of the cleft side to the noncleft side for nostril width, nostril height and alar height were used to assess symmetry. Changes in the mean ratios of the cleft side to the noncleft side at three different time points for three parameters were used to assess stability.
resultsIn both groups, the alar height was improved after operation and remained stable in the follow-up period. The nostril width significantly decreased in G1 and G2, remaining consistent in the follow-up for G1 but increasing in G2. The nostril height significantly increased in G1 and stabilized during the follow-up, while it decreased after operation and remained so throughout the follow-up for G2.
conclusionBoth techniques can maintain stability more than six months after surgery, except for the nostril width with simple alar cartilage suspension and internal fixation technique. The nasal septal cartilage implantation technique may have advantages in improving the nasal symmetry of the nostril width and height.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.