ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
MISDP: multi-task fusion visit interval for sequential diagnosis prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multicenter validation of a scalable, interpretable, multitask prediction model for multiple clinical outcomes.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsDiagnostic prediction is a central application that spans various medical specialties and scenarios, sequential diagnosis prediction is the process of predicting future diagnoses based on patients' historical visits. Prior research has underexplored the impact of irregular intervals between patient visits on predictive models, despite its significance.
methodWe developed the Multi-task Fusion Visit Interval for Sequential Diagnosis Prediction (MISDP) framework to address this research gap. The MISDP framework integrated sequential diagnosis prediction with visit interval prediction within a multi-task learning paradigm. It uses positional encoding and interval encoding to handle irregular patient visit intervals. Furthermore, it incorporates historical attention residue to enhance the multi-head self-attention mechanism, focusing on extracting long-term dependencies from clinical historical visits.
resultsThe MISDP model exhibited superior performance across real-world healthcare dataset, irrespective of the training data scarcity or abundance. With only 20% training data, MISDP achieved a 4. 2% improvement over KAME; when training data ranged from 60 to 80%, MISDP surpassed SETOR, the top baseline, by 0. 8% in accuracy, underscoring its robustness and efficacy in sequential diagnosis prediction task.
conclusionsThe MISDP model significantly improves the accuracy of Sequential Diagnosis Prediction. The result highlights the advantage of multi-task learning in synergistically enhancing the performance of individual sub-task. Notably, irregular visit interval factors and historical attention residue has been particularly instrumental in refining the precision of sequential diagnosis prediction, suggesting a promising avenue for advancing clinical decision-making through data-driven modeling approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.