Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707100›Full record

ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2025

Reasoning on Rounds Volume 2: a Framework for Teaching Management Reasoning in the Inpatient Setting.

John C Penner, Daniel J Minter, Emily A Abdoler, Andrew S Parsons

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John C PennerMedical Service, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA. john.penner@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-9409
Daniel J MinterDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Emily A AbdolerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrew S ParsonsDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management reasoning (MR) is a key domain of clinical reasoning that is distinct from the more heavily studied and taught diagnostic reasoning (DR). Despite MR's importance to patient care, there are few published strategies for incorporating MR education into the clinical learning environment. In this perspective, the authors review key theories and clinical principles relevant to MR and integrate these concepts with previously described tools for teaching MR to provide frontline clinical teachers with practical, theory-informed framework for teaching MR during inpatient rounds.

Indexed as

Clinical ReasoningInpatientsTeaching RoundsClinical CompetenceHumansTeachingclinical reasoningclinical teachinginpatient roundsmanagement reasoning

Identifiers

PMID39707100
PMCPMC12045913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.