ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Scholars in Health Equity: A Program of Structured Physician Faculty Development.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStructured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.
aimTo describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth. SETTING AND
participantsTwenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth. DISCUSSION: Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.