ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024
Monitoring data compilations can be leveraged to highlight relationships between estuarine and watershed factors influencing eutrophication in estuaries.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estuaries have been adversely impacted by increased nutrient loads. Eutrophication impacts from these loads include excess algal blooms and low oxygen conditions. In this study, we leveraged data from 28 monitoring programs in the northeastern US to explore the relationships between eutrophication response variables and watershed and estuarine variables. Extensive effort was needed to locate, harmonize, and assure the quality of the data. Random forest regression allowed us to identify the most important variables that could predict summer total nitrogen (TN), chlorophyll (chl), and bottom dissolved oxygen (DO). Several different summaries of the data were assessed. The best models for TN and chl used data summarized by estuary and year, explaining > 70% and > 60% of the variation, respectively. The best model for DO used data that were averaged by estuary across all years and explained > 55% of the variation. All models showed the importance of variables related to nutrient loading, such as population density and % development, and variables related to flushing rate, such as tidal range, length:width at mouth, and estuary openness. Future work will examine the impacts of climate on eutrophication response variables. This study demonstrates the utility of combining data from multiple unrelated routine monitoring programs to understand eutrophication impacts at regional scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.