ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Showcasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in neurological surgery: a comparative analysis of neurological surgery residency program websites in the United States.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residency websites can often be crucial for influencing neurosurgery applicants' first impressions of programs. This study explores the representation of diversity on neurological surgery residency program websites and evaluates the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statements. The websites of 117 neurological surgery residency programs were evaluated for the presence of 12 diversity and inclusion elements. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine significant differences in DEI scores between neurological surgery residency program websites. Program analysis revealed a mean diversity score of 7.9 out of a maximum score of 12, equating to the presence of 66% of possible DEI elements in our scoring system. Top-50 ranked programs (Doximity) exhibited a significantly higher mean diversity score (8.6 +/- 2.7) compared to those outside the top-50 (7.2 +/- 2.9) (p = 0.009). Accessibility of DEI content varied, with most program websites either having a direct link to a separate DEI webpage (41%) or lacking any DEI elements (42%). A secondary analysis found that the presence of a DEI statement on a program's webpage was not significantly associated with Doximity ranking, NIH funding, geographic region, or hospital funding. However, programs with a DEI statement were significantly more likely to have various additional DEI elements (p < 0.001). While many neurological surgery residencies include elements of DEI on their websites, this is not currently a consistent practice across all programs. We advocate that these initiatives should be prominently featured on program websites to aid applicants in making informed decisions about their training journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39707067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.