Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707038›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025

A novel 3D image registration technique for augmented reality vision in minimally invasive thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy.

J J Peek, X Zhang, K Hildebrandt, S A Max, A H Sadeghi, A J J C Bogers, E A F Mahtab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lung metastases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J J PeekDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8412-2851
X ZhangComputer Vision Lab, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8368-3542
K HildebrandtComputer Graphics and Visualization Lab, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9196-3923
S A MaxDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-3924
A H SadeghiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-2341
A J J C BogersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-1998
E A F MahtabDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.a.f.mahtab@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-5509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this feasibility study, we aimed to create a dedicated pulmonary augmented reality (AR) workflow to enable a semi-automated intraoperative overlay of the pulmonary anatomy during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS).

methodsInitially, the stereoscopic cameras were calibrated to obtain the intrinsic camera parameters. Intraoperatively, stereoscopic images were recorded and a 3D point cloud was generated from these images. By manually selecting the bifurcation key points, the 3D segmentation (from the diagnostic CT scan) was registered onto the intraoperative 3D point cloud.

resultsImage reprojection errors were 0.34 and 0.22 pixels for the VATS and RATS cameras, respectively. We created disparity maps and point clouds for all eight patients. Time for creation of the 3D AR overlay was 5 min. Validation of the point clouds was performed, resulting in a median absolute error of 0.20 mm [IQR 0.10-0.54]. We were able to visualize the AR overlay and identify the arterial bifurcations adequately for five patients. In addition to creating AR overlays of the visible or invisible structures intraoperatively, we successfully visualized branch labels and altered the transparency of the overlays.

conclusionAn algorithm was developed transforming the operative field into a 3D point cloud surface. This allowed for an accurate registration and visualization of preoperative 3D models. Using this system, surgeons can navigate through the patient's anatomy intraoperatively, especially during crucial moments, by visualizing otherwise invisible structures. This proposed registration method lays the groundwork for automated intraoperative AR navigation during minimally invasive pulmonary resections.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityImaging, Three-DimensionalLung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray Computed3D point cloudAugmented realityRegistrationRobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgeryVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39707038
PMCPMC12034595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.