ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Current status and influencing factors of nutrition management in patients with digestive tract cancer from the integrated perspective of medical care staff, patients, and family caregivers: a qualitative study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between nutrition-focused evidence-based nursing and post-operative nutritional status in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- YouTube videos on nutrition and pediatric cancer: scientific reliability and quality.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Controversies in NEN: An ENETS position statement on nutritional support in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Review
- Nutrition education experience and needs of patients undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe research aimed to collect experience and viewpoints related to the nutrition management of patients with digestive tract cancers from medical care staff, patients, and family caregivers and provide reasonable and effective references for the mode of nutrition management of these patients.
methodsUsing a phenomenological qualitative research method, six physicians, six nurses, three nutritionists, six patients, and six family caregivers from a tertiary A cancer hospital in Jiangsu Province were chosen by purposive sampling methods from February to June 2023. Data was collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed by the content analysis method.
resultsData analysis revealed two major themes, each with four subcategories: current status of clinical nutrition management tract cancers which consisted of "lack of whole-process nutrition management model," "inadequate role of nutrition management professionals," "lack of a mechanism for continuous improvement of nutrition management quality," and "lack of nutrition science popularization and training system" and influencing factors of clinical nutrition management that contained "patient-related factors," "family-related factors," "medical staff-related factors," and "hospital environment and policy-related factors."
conclusionsNutritional management of digestive cancer patients is currently inadequate and should be viewed through an integrated perspective. Improvements should be made at four angles: patient, family, healthcare provider, and hospital environment by establishing a multidisciplinary nutritional management team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39707036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.