ArticleCell biology and toxicology2024
E2F1-driven CENPM expression promotes glycolytic reprogramming and tumorigenicity in glioblastoma.
Article in Cell biology and toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting centromere protein M represses cell growth and mobility via inactivating AKT pathway but less affects BRAF inhibitor sensitivity in cutaneous melanoma.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- The therapeutic effect and specific mechanism involved active Chinese medicine component biochaninA in glioma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Centromere protein M (CENPM), traditionally associated with chromosome segregation, is now recognized for its significant role in cancer biology. Particularly in glioblastoma (GBM), where less is known about CENPM compared to other centromere proteins (CENPs), it appears crucially involved in regulating tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metabolic reprogramming-key factors in GBM's aggressiveness. Initial analyses using the GEPIA database (TCGA/GTEx datasets) reveal distinct patterns of CENPM expression in GBM, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target. Our study manipulated CENPM expression through shRNA-mediated knockdown and vector-based overexpression in GBM cell lines LN229 and U251. Knockdown resulted in a 50% reduction in cell proliferation and a 70% decrease in invasion, accompanied by diminished glycolytic markers such as glucose consumption, lactate production, and ATP levels. Conversely, overexpression of CENPM enhanced both metabolic activity and invasive capacities. The introduction of the glycolytic inhibitor 2-DG effectively reversed the effects of CENPM modulation, highlighting a dependency on glycolytic pathways. Moreover, we identified E2F1 as a key regulator of CENPM, linking it to GBM's metabolic alterations. In vivo studies using a BALB/c nude mouse xenograft model demonstrated that CENPM knockdown significantly inhibits tumor growth, with treated groups showing a 60% reduction in tumor volume over four weeks. These findings underscore the E2F1-CENPM axis as a promising target for therapeutic strategies, aiming to disrupt the metabolic and invasive pathways facilitated by CENPM in GBM. These insights establish a foundation for targeting the metabolic dependencies of tumor cells, potentially leading to innovative treatments for GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.