Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707031›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Size threshold as a risk for malignant transformation in typical ovarian dermoid lesions: a scoping review.

Haidey Jordan, Gavin Low, Mitchell P Wilson

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haidey JordanUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. jhaidey@ualberta.ca.
Gavin LowUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mitchell P WilsonUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe O-RADS malignancy risk stratification of typical ovarian dermoid cysts by using a 10 cm threshold is based on expert consensus rather than analysis of objective clinical data. This comprehensive scoping review consolidated all currently available studies evaluating typical benign ovarian dermoid cyst size and risk for malignant transformation.

methodsA systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane library was performed from inception to January 14, 2024, using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A grey literature search and forward searching of reference lists from included studies were performed. Case reports and case series evaluating dermoid cyst size and malignant transformation as defined by a pathological reference standard were included. Data synthesis was provided as a qualitative review of the existing literature.

resultsTwenty-five studies were included in qualitative synthesis comprising 6 case reports and 19 retrospective studies with a total of 15,295 dermoid cysts. Of these, 215 lesions demonstrated malignant transformation. Studies reporting dermoid size with malignant transformation ranged from 1 to 32 cm with 46/173 (27%) total malignant transformation lesions measuring < 10 cm. Solid enhancing components were infrequently reported but all measured > 1 cm when described.

conclusionMore than 25% of dermoid cysts with malignant transformation may be classified as "almost certainly benign" with the current 10 cm O-RADS malignancy risk threshold. Although surveillance of O-RADS 2 dermoid cysts may improve sensitivity, modifying a caveat recommendation for MRI O-RADS +/- gyn-oncologist referral when potentially solid components are present in otherwise typically benign dermoid cysts may be appropriate.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticDermoid CystOvarian NeoplasmsTeratomaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRisk AssessmentDermoidMalignantMalignant transformationOvarySizeTeratoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.