Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707019›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Opinion of Polish doctors on the use of futile therapy.

Maria Damps, Maksymilian Gajda, Łukasz Wiktor, Elżbieta Byrska-Maciejasz, Beata Rybojad, Małgorzata Kowalska, Alicja Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Anna Paprocka-Lipińska, Ewa Kucewicz-Czech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria DampsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8723-6865
Maksymilian GajdaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2240-3575
Łukasz WiktorDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Upper Silesian Children's Health Centre, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5777-3835
Elżbieta Byrska-MaciejaszDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Children's Hospital of Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
Beata RybojadDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-9194
Małgorzata KowalskaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-0346
Alicja Bartkowska-ŚniatkowskaDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4950-2346
Anna Paprocka-LipińskaDepartment of Medical Ethics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-7311
Ewa Kucewicz-CzechDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-6310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discontinuation of futile therapy is increasingly discussed in Polish clinical practice. Given the need to ensure patient well-being, it is essential to consider whether all clinical options resulting from medical progress should be used for every patient and on what grounds decisions to limit therapy should be based. The aim of our study was to determine the opinions of Polish medical doctors on this topic. We anonymously surveyed physicians across various specialties. An analysis of the collected data was carried out using descriptive and analytical methods. A total of 323 physicians participated in the study; 93% of them were aware of the problem of futile therapy in adults, with intensivists being significantly more aware (P = 0.002). Additionally, 95% of respondents supported the idea of discontinuing futile therapy, and over 68% used the therapy discontinuation protocol. Among the most common reasons for undertaking futile therapy, respondents cited fear of legal liability (93.5%), as well as fear of being accused of unethical behavior (62.2%) and fear before talking to the patient/patient's family and their reactions (57.9%). Respondents also identified factors that would facilitate making decisions about limiting futile therapy, including precise qualification criteria for limiting therapy and education in this area (95.3%), the patient's declaration of will (87.5%), and a clear legal act (81.3%). The majority of study participants supported the idea of limiting futile therapy, and this issue is well known among Polish physicians.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMedical FutilityPhysiciansWithholding TreatmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39707019
PMCPMC11967861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.