ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2025
[Academics in ophthalmology : An analysis of the gender distribution at German university hospitals and the Clinician Scientist Program].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of female ophthalmologists has risen steadily in recent years. The aim of this study is to investigate the gender ratios, subspecialties, and academic degrees of ophthalmologists at German university hospitals. Additionally, the study analyzes the proportion of women in science programs such as the Clinician Scientist Program.
methodsData collection was performed in August 2023 based on the official websites of university eye clinics and the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG). The numbers of male and female residents, specialists, senior physicians, and chief physicians as well as subspecialties and academic degrees were determined. Information on the Clinician Scientist Program was collected in a 2022 survey by the Medical Faculty Council.
resultsIn August 2023 there were two female chief physicians at the university eye clinics (5%), both specialized in retinal surgery. There were more male senior physicians than female senior physicians (59.9% vs. 40.1%). There was no significant difference between the genders in terms of the number of habilitations (p = 0.554). There were more female specialists than male specialists at the university clinics (58.6% vs. 41.4%) as well as more female residents (56.9% vs. 43.1%). Female specialists were significantly more likely to hold a doctorate than their male colleagues (p = 0.037). The percentage of female applicants for the Clinician Scientist Program nationwide in 2022 was 46.6%, with 41.8% female program starters in 2021 and 39.7% female program graduates in 2021.
conclusionSenior and chief physician roles at university eye clinics remain predominantly occupied by men. Additionally, support programs for young researchers are still predominantly awarded to men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39706980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.