Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39706922›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2025

CT-based clinical-radiomics model to predict progression and drive clinical applicability in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Gema Bruixola, Delfina Dualde-Beltrán, Ana Jimenez-Pastor, Anna Nogué, Fuensanta Bellvís, Almudena Fuster-Matanzo, Clara Alfaro-Cervelló, Nuria Grimalt, Nader Salhab-Ibáñez, Vicente Escorihuela and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Contrast-enhanced CT-based habitat radiomics for analyzing the predictive capability for oral squamous cell carcinoma].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gema Bruixola *Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia-INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Delfina Dualde-Beltrán *Radiology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ana Jimenez-PastorQuibim-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain.
Anna NoguéQuibim-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain.
Fuensanta BellvísQuibim-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain.
Almudena Fuster-MatanzoQuibim-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain.
Clara Alfaro-CervellóPathology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia-INCLIVA Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Nuria GrimaltMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia-INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Nader Salhab-IbáñezRadiology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente EscorihuelaOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
María Eugenia IglesiasOral and Maxillary Surgery Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
María MaroñasRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ángel Alberich-BayarriQuibim-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Valencia, Spain. angel@quibim.com.
Andrés CervantesMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia-INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. andres.cervantes@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-3691
Noelia TarazonaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia-INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. noetalla@incliva.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive chemoradiation is the primary treatment for locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LAHNSCC). Optimising outcome predictions requires validated biomarkers, since TNM8 and HPV could have limitations. Radiomics may enhance risk stratification.

methodsThis single-centre observational study collected clinical data and baseline CT scans from 171 LAHNSCC patients treated with chemoradiation. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and test (20%) sets, with a 5-fold cross-validation on the training set. Researchers extracted 108 radiomics features from each primary tumour and applied survival analysis and classification models to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-year progression, respectively. Performance was evaluated using inverse probability of censoring weights and c-index for the PFS model and AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the 5-year progression model. Feature importance was measured by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method and patient stratification was assessed through Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsThe final dataset included 171 LAHNSCC patients, with 53% experiencing disease progression at 5 years. The random survival forest model best predicted PFS, with an AUC of 0.64 and CI of 0.66 on the test set, highlighting 4 radiomics features and TNM8 as significant contributors. It successfully stratified patients into low and high-risk groups (log-rank p < 0.005). The extreme gradient boosting model most effectively predicted a 5-year progression, incorporating 12 radiomics features and four clinical variables, achieving an AUC of 0.74, sensitivity of 0.53, specificity of 0.81, and accuracy of 0.66 on the test set.

conclusionThe combined clinical-radiomics model improved the standard TNM8 and clinical variables in predicting 5-year progression though further validation is necessary. KEY POINTS: Question There is an unmet need for non-invasive biomarkers to guide treatment in locally advanced head and neck cancer. Findings Clinical data (TNM8 staging, primary tumour site, age, and smoking) plus radiomics improved 5-year progression prediction compared with the clinical comprehensive model or TNM staging alone. Clinical relevance SHAP simplifies complex machine learning radiomics models for clinicians by using easy-to-understand graphical representations, promoting explainability.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsSensitivity and SpecificityCTHead and neck cancerImaging biomarkersPFSRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39706922
PMCPMC12165904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.