Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39706917›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Improving the reporting of metagenomic virome-scale data.

Wei-Shan Chang, Erin Harvey, Jackie E Mahar, Cadhla Firth, Mang Shi, Etienne Simon-Loriere, Jemma L Geoghegan, Michelle Wille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Distinct YY dinucleotide periodicity in adeno-associated virus DNA.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fungal ecology in the age of 'omics.The New phytologist · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The respiratory tract virome: unravelling the role of viral dark matter in respiratory health and disease.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei-Shan ChangSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-6827
Erin HarveySchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9379-2064
Jackie E MaharSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2687-9810
Cadhla FirthCollege of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-8973
Mang ShiSun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen campus of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-4437
Etienne Simon-LoriereEvolutionary Genomics of RNA Viruses, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-7743
Jemma L GeogheganDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0970-0153
Michelle WilleSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. michelle.wille@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5629-0196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade metagenomic sequencing has facilitated an increasing number of virome-scale studies, leading to an exponential expansion in understanding of virus diversity. This is partially driven by the decreasing costs of metagenomic sequencing, improvements in computational tools for revealing novel viruses, and an increased understanding of the key role that viruses play in human and animal health. A central concern associated with this remarkable increase in the number of virome-scale studies is the lack of broadly accepted "gold standards" for reporting the data and results generated. This is of particular importance for animal virome studies as there are a multitude of nuanced approaches for both data presentation and analysis, all of which impact the resulting outcomes. As such, the results of published studies can be difficult to contextualise and may be of reduced utility due to reporting deficiencies. Herein, we aim to address these reporting issues by outlining recommendations for the presentation of virome data, encouraging a transparent communication of findings that can be interpreted in evolutionary and ecological contexts.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsViromeVirusesAnimalsGenome, ViralHumansMetagenome

Identifiers

PMID39706917
PMCPMC11662069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.