ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Neural networks for predicting etiological diagnosis of uveitis.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The expanding horizon: Role of widefield imaging in uveitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Explainable machine learning-based identification of transcriptomic biomarkers in CD1c+ dendritic cells for non-infectious uveitis: an integrative analysis of bulk RNA-seq data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MLGT: A multimodal graph attention network for virtual screening of anti-Uveitis drugs.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Predicting Recurrent Course in Uveitis Using Baseline Clinical Characteristics.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Clearing the clouds: neural networks to forecast the aetiology of uveitis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe large number and heterogeneity of causes of uveitis make the etiological diagnosis a complex task. The clinician must consider all the information concerning the ophthalmological and extra-ophthalmological features of the patient. Diagnostic machine learning algorithms have been developed and provide a correct diagnosis in one-half to three-quarters of cases. However, they are not integrated into daily clinical practice. The aim is to determine whether machine learning models can predict the etiological diagnosis of uveitis from clinical information.
methodsThis cohort study was performed on uveitis patients with unknown etiology at first consultation. One hundred nine variables, including demographic, ophthalmic, and clinical information, associated with complementary exams were analyzed. Twenty-five causes of uveitis were included. A neural network was developed to predict the etiological diagnosis of uveitis. The performance of the model was evaluated and compared to a gold standard: etiological diagnosis established by a consensus of two uveitis experts.
resultsA total of 375 patients were included in this analysis. Findings showed that the neural network type (Multilayer perceptron) (NN-MLP) presented the best prediction of the etiological diagnosis of uveitis. The NN-MLP's most probable diagnosis matched the senior clinician diagnosis in 292 of 375 patients (77.8%, 95% CI: 77.4-78.0). It achieved 93% accuracy (95% CI: 92.8-93.1%) when considering the two most probable diagnoses. The NN-MLP performed well in diagnosing idiopathic uveitis (sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 82%). For more than three-quarters of etiologies, our NN-MLP demonstrated good diagnostic performance (sensitivity > 70% and specificity > 80%).
conclusionStudy results suggest that developing models for accurately predicting the etiological diagnosis of uveitis with undetermined etiology based on clinical information is feasible. Such NN-MLP could be used for the etiological assessments of uveitis with unknown etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.