Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39706861›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Clinical utility of receptor status prediction in breast cancer and misdiagnosis identification using deep learning on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides.

Gil Shamai, Ran Schley, Alexandra Cretu, Tal Neoran, Edmond Sabo, Yoav Binenbaum, Shachar Cohen, Tal Goldman, António Polónia, Keren Drumea and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gil ShamaiDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institue of Technology, Haifa, Israel. sgils@cs.technion.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-3027
Ran SchleyDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institue of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Alexandra CretuDepartment of Pathology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Tal NeoranDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institue of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Edmond SaboDepartment of Pathology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Yoav BinenbaumDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9901-7782
Shachar CohenDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institue of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Tal GoldmanDepartment of Pathology, Haemek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
António PolóniaInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8312-1681
Keren DrumeaBreast Cancer Unit, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Karin StoliarFaculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institue of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Ron KimmelDepartment of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institue of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 679/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular profiling of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and ERBB2 (also known as Her2) is essential for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment planning. Nevertheless, current methods rely on the qualitative interpretation of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which can be costly, time-consuming, and inconsistent. Here we explore the clinical utility of predicting receptor status from digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) slides using machine learning trained and evaluated on a multi-institutional dataset.

methodsWe developed a deep learning system to predict ER, PR, and ERBB2 statuses from digitized H&E slides and evaluated its utility in three clinical applications: identifying hormone receptor-positive patients, serving as a second-read tool for quality assurance, and addressing intratumor heterogeneity. For development and validation, we collected 19,845 slides from 7,950 patients across six independent cohorts representative of diverse clinical settings.

resultsHere we show that the system identifies 30.5% of patients as hormone receptor-positive, achieving a specificity of 0.9982 and a positive predictive value of 0.9992, demonstrating its ability to determine eligibility for hormone therapy without immunohistochemistry. By restaining and reassessing samples flagged as potential false negatives, we discover 31 cases of misdiagnosed ER, PR, and ERBB2 statuses.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the utility of the system in diverse clinical settings and its potential to improve breast cancer diagnosis. Given the substantial focus of current guidelines on reducing false negative diagnoses, this study supports the integration of H&E-based machine learning tools into workflows for quality assurance.

Identifiers

PMID39706861
PMCPMC11661999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.