ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Clinical utility of receptor status prediction in breast cancer and misdiagnosis identification using deep learning on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An agentic framework for autonomous scientific discovery in cancer pathology.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Domain generalisation challenges in breast cancer molecular classification using foundation models: a cross-cohort exploratory study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Prediction of OncotypeDX recurrence score using hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Enabling DCIS subtyping: leveraging foundation models for robust grading and molecular biomarker scoring.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Histology-Derived Signatures Predict Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit in Randomized Trials of Early Breast Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Deep learning on histopathological images to predict breast cancer recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit: a multicentre, model development and validation study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2026Article
- How artificial intelligence applied to digital pathology could guide treatment personalization in breast cancer.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Breast cancer pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Virtual immunohistochemistry for ER and PR prediction in breast cancer histopathology: a two-stage conditional generative framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A multimodal framework to identify molecular mechanisms driving patient group-associated morphology through the integration of spatial transcriptomics and whole slide imaging.NPJ artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Emerging Approaches in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- ESPWA: a deep learning-enabled tool for precision-based use of endocrine therapy in resource-limited settings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Computational pathology for breast cancer: Where do we stand for prognostic applications?Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Review
- Deep Learning on Histopathological Images to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMolecular profiling of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and ERBB2 (also known as Her2) is essential for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment planning. Nevertheless, current methods rely on the qualitative interpretation of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which can be costly, time-consuming, and inconsistent. Here we explore the clinical utility of predicting receptor status from digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) slides using machine learning trained and evaluated on a multi-institutional dataset.
methodsWe developed a deep learning system to predict ER, PR, and ERBB2 statuses from digitized H&E slides and evaluated its utility in three clinical applications: identifying hormone receptor-positive patients, serving as a second-read tool for quality assurance, and addressing intratumor heterogeneity. For development and validation, we collected 19,845 slides from 7,950 patients across six independent cohorts representative of diverse clinical settings.
resultsHere we show that the system identifies 30.5% of patients as hormone receptor-positive, achieving a specificity of 0.9982 and a positive predictive value of 0.9992, demonstrating its ability to determine eligibility for hormone therapy without immunohistochemistry. By restaining and reassessing samples flagged as potential false negatives, we discover 31 cases of misdiagnosed ER, PR, and ERBB2 statuses.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the utility of the system in diverse clinical settings and its potential to improve breast cancer diagnosis. Given the substantial focus of current guidelines on reducing false negative diagnoses, this study supports the integration of H&E-based machine learning tools into workflows for quality assurance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.