ArticleNPJ science of food2024
Perforated imprinting on high moisture meat analogue confers long range mechanical anisotropy resembling meat cuts.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Apple Pomace in Ready-to-Eat Plant-Based Meat Analogs: Functionality, Challenges, and Opportunities.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meat cuts, when cooked and masticated, separate into fibrous structures because of the long-range mechanical anisotropy (LMA) exhibited by muscle fascicles, which is not fully recapitulated in alternative proteins produced using molecular alignment technology like high moisture extrusion. We have developed a scalable perforated micro-imprinting technology to greatly enhance LMA in high moisture meat analogue (HMMA). By imprinting 1 mm thick HMMA sheets with perforated patterns (optimized by AI), we observed up to 5 × more anisotropic separation of fibrous structures in a one-dimensional pulling LMA analysis, to match the fibrousness of the cooked chicken breast, duck breast, pork loin and beef loin. We stacked and bound imprinted sheets with transglutaminase (TG) to produce imprinted whole-cuts. Controlling fiber separation in the imprinted cuts achieved hardness ranging from 6578 g to 18467 g (2 cm × 2 cm × 1 cm, 50% strain), which matched meats from different species. Imprinted cuts improved meat-like fiber separation over HMMA when masticated, measured by Euclidean distances (0.057 and 0.106 respectively) to animal meat cuts on image features. In sensory evaluation, imprinted cuts improved consumer acceptance by 33.3% and meat-like fibrousness by 20%, by significantly enhancing the HMMA appearance, texture, and mouthfeel.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.