ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Trends in fluoroquinolone prescribing in UK primary and secondary care between 2019 and 2023.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effectiveness of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) antibiotic switch (IVOS) interventions in managing community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia-a systematic review.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Impact of risk mitigation measures on oral fluoroquinolone prescribing: a multi-site population-based Canadian cohort study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFluoroquinolones are important antibiotics but have associations with a number of adverse outcomes. A recent (January 2024) decision by the UK drug regulator, the Medicines and Health Regulatory Authority (MHRA), restricted systemic use of these antibiotics to when 'absolutely necessary'. One stated reason for the ban was the failure of previous guidance (2019, 2023) to reduce prescribing, with the MHRA stating there had been 'no change in prescribing' of fluoroquinolones in relation to guidance.
methodsWe evaluated the trend in prescribing of fluoroquinolones and comparator antibiotics using national data for all primary care practices in England from 2019 to 2023. We calculated the percent change in prescribing of fluoroquinolones using linear regression, comparing with other antibacterials. We also performed analysis on secondary care prescribing and included hospital inpatient stay data.
resultsIn primary care, there was a negative trend in fluoroquinolone item dispensing, with a 4.2% reduction in items dispensed per year (95% CI -5.2% to -3.3%; P = 6 × 10-13). This occurred despite no change in overall antibacterial prescription and no decrease in comparator antibiotics. Secondary care data showed stable prescription of fluoroquinolones, but comparator antibiotics increased, leading to relatively fewer prescriptions compared with other agents.
conclusionsThere was a reduction in fluoroquinolone prescribing in England in absolute and relative terms between 2019 and 2023 in primary care, and absolute terms in secondary care. These findings do not support the MHRA's claim that there has been no change in prescribing in response to warnings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.