ArticleClinical breast cancer2025
Clinical and Multiomic Features Differentiate Young Black and White Breast Cancer Cohorts Derived by Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in Clinical breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are documented differences in Breast cancer (BrCA) presentations and outcomes between Black and White patients. In addition to molecular factors, socioeconomic, racial, and clinical factors result in disparities in outcomes for women in the United States. Using machine learning and unsupervised biclustering methods within a multiomics framework, here we sought to shed light on the biological and clinical underpinnings of observed differences between Black and White BrCA patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe examined The Cancer Genome Atlas BrCA samples from stage II patients aged 50 or younger that are Black (BAA50) or White (W50) (n = 139 patients; 36 BAA50 and 103 W50) These patients were chosen because marked differences in survival were observed in an earlier study. A variety of multiomic data sets were analyzed to further characterize the clinical and molecular disparities for insights.
resultsWe coupled RNAseq data with protein-protein interaction as well as BrCA-specific protein co-expression network data to identify 2 novel biclusters. These biclusters are significantly associated with clinical features including race, number of lymph nodes involved with disease, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status and menopausal status. There were also differentially mutated genes. Using DNA methylation data, we identified differentially methylated genes. Machine learning algorithms were trained on differential methylation values of driver genes. The trained algorithms were successful in predicting the bicluster assignment of each sample.
conclusionThese results demonstrate that there was a significant association between the cluster membership and BAA50 and W50 cohorts, indicating that these biclusters accurately stratify these cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.