Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39706650›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2025

An innovative Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation for child health in rural Pakistan (CoMIC): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.

Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zahra Ali Padhani, Arjumand Rizvi, Mushtaq Mirani, Muhammad Khan Jamali, Imran Ahmed Chauhadry, Imtiaz Sheikh, Sana Khatoon, Khan Muhammad and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03594279 (Evaluation of a Community Engagement and Demand Creation Strategy for Childhood Diarrhea and Pneumonia in Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03594279 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Community Engagement and Demand Creation Strategy for Childhood Diarrhea and Pneumonia in Pakistan

TypeinterventionalSponsorAga Khan UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled48ConditionsChildhood Diarrhea, Childhood Pneumonia, Community Mobilisation, Sanitation and HygieneArmsCommunity Mobilization, Community Mobilization and Community Incentive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jai K DasInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: jai.das@aku.edu.
Rehana A SalamThe Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Zahra Ali PadhaniRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Arjumand RizviInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mushtaq MiraniInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Khan JamaliInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Imran Ahmed ChauhadryCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Imtiaz SheikhInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sana KhatoonInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khan MuhammadInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rasool BuxInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Anjum NaqviInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fariha ShaheenCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rafey AliCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sajid MuhammadCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Simon CousensLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaInstitute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious diseases remain the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years due to disparities in access and acceptance of essential interventions. The Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation (CoMIC) trial was designed to evaluate a customised community mobilisation and incentivisation strategy for improving coverage of evidence-based interventions for child health in Pakistan.

methodsCoMIC was a three-arm cluster-randomised, controlled trial in rural areas of Pakistan. Clusters were formed by grouping villages based on geographical proximity, ethnic consistency, and ensuring a population between 1500 to 3000 per cluster. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either community mobilisation, community mobilisation and incentivisation, or the control arm. Community mobilisation included formation of village committees which conducted awareness activities, while clusters in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group were provided with a novel conditional, collective, community-based incentive (C3I) in addition to community mobilisation. C3I was conditioned on serial incremental targets for collective improvement in coverage at cluster level of three key indicators (primary outcomes): proportion of fully immunised children, use of oral rehydration solution, and sanitation index, assessed at 6 months, 15 months, and 24 months, and village committees decided on non-cash incentives for people in the villages. Data were analysed as intention-to-treat by an independent team masked to study groups. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594279, and is completed.

findingsBetween Oct 1, 2018 and Oct 31, 2020, 21 638 children younger than 5 years from 24 846 households, with a total population of 139 005 in 48 clusters, were included in the study. 16 clusters comprising of 152 villages and 7361 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation and incentivisation group; 16 clusters comprising of 166 villages and 7546 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation group; and 16 clusters comprising of 139 villages and 6731 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the control group. Endline analyses were conducted on 3812 children (1284 in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group, 1276 in the community mobilisation group, and 1252 in the control group). Multivariable analysis indicates improvements in all primary outcomes including a higher proportion of fully immunised children (risk ratio [RR] 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·5]), higher total sanitation index (mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·6-1·9]), and increased oral rehydration solution use (RR 1·5 [1·0-2·2]) in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group compared with the control group at 24 months. There was no evidence of difference between community mobilisation and control for any of the primary outcomes.

interpretationCommunity mobilisation and incentivisation led to enhanced acceptance evidenced by improved community behaviours and increased coverage of essential interventions for child health. These findings have the potential to inform policy and future implementation of programmes targeting behaviour change but would need evaluation for varying outcomes and different contexts.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation. TRANSLATIONS: For the Sindhi and Urdu translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Child HealthMotivationRural PopulationChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantMalePakistan

Identifiers

PMID39706650
PMCPMC11659842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.