Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2025
Avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: final analysis of the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02684006 (A PHASE 3, MULTINATIONAL, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, PARALLEL-ARM STUDY OF AVELUMAB), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A phase 3, multinational, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study of avelumab (msb0010718c) in combination with axitinib (inlyta(registered)) versus sunitinib (sutent(registered)) monotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Time-Dependent Comparative Effectiveness of First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Restricted Mean Survival Time-Based Network Meta-analysis.Targeted oncology · 2026Pooled it
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a risk-stratified systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of First-Line Treatments for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Objective Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival.Targeted oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Subsequent systemic therapy initiation after first-line discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: insights from a Japanese real-world cohort.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Comparison of Dual Checkpoint Blockade and Immunotherapy Plus TKIs in Metastatic RCC.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- Efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- [Long-term survival achieved with benmelstobart plus anlotinib in a patient with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A case report].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Features, Mechanisms, and Lessons from Lung Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: review of current evidence and future applications.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Durable benefit in a crowded frontline landscape: final results for nivolumab-cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Bayesian Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Avelumab Plus Axitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Real-world efficacy and toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab as a first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma according to IMDC risk criteria-A multi-center retrospective analysis on behalf of the GUARDIANS group.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Pembrolizumab-Lenvatinib Versus Axitinib-Based Regimens in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- A Case of Cytokine Release Syndrome Induced by Avelumab and Axitinib Combination Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.IJU case reports · 2026Article
- Soluble MAdCAM-1 as a biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), first-line treatment with avelumab + axitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report the final analysis, including the primary analysis of overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with untreated aRCC (any prognostic risk score) were enrolled. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS in the programmed death-ligand 1-positive (PD-L1+) population. ORR, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also assessed.
resultsThe minimum follow-up was 68 months in all patients. The median OS with avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib, respectively, was 43.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 36.5-51.7 months] versus 36.2 months (95% CI 29.8-44.2 months) in the PD-L1+ population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (95% CI 0.701-1.057); P = 0.0755] and 44.8 months (95% CI 39.7-51.1 months) versus 38.9 months (95% CI 31.4-45.2 months) in the overall population [HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.749-1.039); P = 0.0669]. Investigator-assessed PFS remained prolonged with avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib [5-year event-free rate in the overall population, 12.0% (95% CI 8.9% to 15.6%) versus 4.4% (95% CI 2.5% to 7.3%)]. ORR in the overall population was 59.7% (95% CI 55.0% to 64.3%) with avelumab + axitinib versus 32.0% (95% CI 27.7% to 36.5%) with sunitinib; duration of response was ≥5 years in 16.4% (95% CI 12.0% to 21.4%) versus 9.2% (95% CI 4.6% to 15.7%), respectively. Rates of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were 66.8% versus 61.5%, respectively. PROs were similar between arms.
conclusionsJAVELIN Renal 101 provides the longest follow-up to date for immune checkpoint inhibitor + tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination treatment from a phase III trial in aRCC. OS analyses favored avelumab + axitinib versus sunitinib but did not reach statistical significance; subsequent treatment may have impacted results. Avelumab + axitinib provided long-term efficacy benefits versus sunitinib, including prolonged PFS, a nearly doubled ORR, and more durable responses, with a manageable long-term safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.