ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2025
Detection of late gadolinium enhancement in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using machine learning.
Article in International journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging AI-guided stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for scar-related refractory ventricular tachycardia: a case report.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2026Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance research advances in myocardial fibrosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLate gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) typically represents myocardial fibrosis and may lead to fatal ventricular arrhythmias. However, CMR is resource-intensive and sometimes contraindicated. Thus, in patients with HCM, we aimed to detect LGE on CMR by applying machine learning (ML) algorithm to clinical parameters. METHODS AND
resultsIn this trans-Pacific multicenter study of HCM, a ML model was developed to distinguish the presence or absence of LGE on CMR by ridge classification method using 22 clinical parameters including 9 echocardiographic data. Among 742 patients in this cohort, the ML model was constructed in 2 institutions in the United States (training set, n = 554) and tested using data from an institution in Japan (test set, n = 188). LGE was detected in 299 patients (54%) in the training set and 76 patients (40%) in the test set. In the test set, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of the ML model derived from the training set was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.84). When compared with a reference model constructed with 3 conventional risk factors for LGE on CMR (AUC 0.69 [95% CI 0.61-0.77]), the ML model outperformed the reference model (DeLong's test P = 0.01).
conclusionsThis trans-Pacific study demonstrates that ML analysis of clinical parameters can distinguish the presence of LGE on CMR in patients with HCM. Our ML model would help physicians identify patients with HCM in whom the pre-test probability of LGE is high, and therefore CMR will have higher utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.