ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2025
One-for-all gene inactivation via PAM-independent base editing in bacteria.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing an Adenine Base Editor inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Pathway crosstalk enables degradation of aromatic compounds in marineApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Precision engineering of the probioticApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Cyanobacterial type I CRISPR-Cas systems: distribution, mechanisms, and genome editing applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Base editing is preferable for bacterial gene inactivation without generating double-strand breaks, requiring homology recombination, or highly efficient DNA delivery capability. However, the potential of base editing is limited by the adjoined dependence on the editing window and protospacer adjacent motif. Herein, we report an unconstrained base-editing system to enable the inactivation of any genes of interest in bacteria. We employed a dCas9 derivative, dSpRY, and activation-induced cytidine deaminase to build a protospacer adjacent motif-independent base editor. Then, we programmed the base editor to exclude the START codon of a gene of interest instead of introducing premature STOP codons to obtain a universal approach for gene inactivation, namely XSTART, with an overall efficiency approaching 100%. By using XSTART, we successfully manipulated the amino acid metabolisms in Escherichia coli, generating glutamine, arginine, and aspartate auxotrophic strains. While we observed a high frequency of off-target events as a trade-off for increased efficiency, refining the regulatory system of XSTART to limit expression levels reduced off-target events by over 60% without sacrificing efficiency, aligning our results with previously reported levels. Finally, the effectiveness of XSTART was also demonstrated in probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 and photoautotrophic cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus, illustrating its potential in reprogramming diverse bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.