ReviewEuropean journal of neurology2025
Microembolic signal detection in acute ischemic stroke: Clinical relevance and impact on treatment individualization-A narrative review.
Review in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microembolic signals in transcranial Doppler and the functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Significance of Microembolic Signal Detection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights Into Ongoing Cerebral Embolization and Occult Etiologies.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnostic Use of Transcranial Doppler and Sonography: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microembolic signal detection in acute ischemic stroke: Clinical relevance and impact on treatment individualization-A narrative review.European journal of neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroembolic signals (MES) can be detected using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in several clinical scenarios, including acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This narrative review aims to provide insights into their role in AIS patient management and outcomes.
methodsThe present narrative review consolidates current observational and randomized evidence on the prevalence and clinical relevance of MES in different AIS subtypes and settings.
resultsMES prevalence is higher in AIS patients with large artery atherosclerosis, indicating unstable or vulnerable plaques, and lower in those with small vessel disease. Detecting MES can significantly aid in managing AIS patients, particularly when the cause is unclear, as MES detected in different cerebral arteries can indicate conditions like covert cardioembolism, aortic arch atherosclerosis, or coagulation disorders, including cancer-related stroke. MES are associated with higher risk of stroke recurrence, independently of the underlying stroke mechanism. The detection of MES during and after acute systemic or endovascular reperfusion procedures in large-vessel occlusion patients appears to be predictive of adverse clinical outcomes and recurrent stroke. Finally, a reduction in MES detection may serve as surrogate marker and intermediate endpoint evaluating secondary stroke prevention treatments in the settings of randomized-controlled clinical trials.
conclusionMES detection on TCD in AIS remains a useful diagnostic tool as it helps the clinicians to approach the stroke underlying mechanism by detecting and quantifying ongoing cerebral embolization and localizing an embolic source in real time. In addition, it allows monitoring and treatment individualization in stroke patients, while further determining recurrent stroke risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.