Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39706173›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025

A recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila temporally sharpens visual inputs.

Michelle M Pang, Feng Chen, Marjorie Xie, Shaul Druckmann, Thomas R Clandinin, Helen H Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of object motion on visual acuity in honeybees.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. On analogies in vertebrate and insect visual systems.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle M PangDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Feng ChenDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Marjorie XieDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Shaul DruckmannDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Thomas R ClandininDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Helen H YangDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: helen_yang2@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

Project 4: Neural Basis of Behavioral SequencesU19NS104655 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MURRAY, RICHARD M · 2017 to 2021
$14.6M
Dissecting Neural Circuit Computations in the Peripheral Visual SystemR01EY022638 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
Dissecting distributed representations by advanced population activity analysis methods and modelingR01EB028171 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DRUCKMANN, SHAUL · 2019 to 2019
$1.1M
Investigating Descending Control of WalkingK99NS129759 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI YANG, HELEN HORAN · 2022 to 2023
$268k
Investigating descending control of walkingR00NS129759 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Helen Horan Yang · 2026 to 2026
$224k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022638NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028171NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS129759NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS129759NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical goal of vision is to detect changes in light intensity, even when these changes are blurred by the spatial resolution of the eye and the motion of the animal. Here, we describe a recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila that compensates for blur and thereby selectively enhances the perceived contrast of moving edges. Using in vivo, two-photon voltage imaging, we measured the temporal response properties of L1 and L2, two cell types that receive direct synaptic input from photoreceptors. These neurons have biphasic responses to brief flashes of light, a hallmark of cells that encode changes in stimulus intensity. However, the second phase was often much larger in area than the first, creating an unusual temporal filter. Genetic dissection revealed that recurrent neural circuitry strongly shapes the second phase of the response, informing the structure of a dynamical model. By applying this model to moving natural images, we demonstrate that rather than veridically representing stimulus changes, this temporal processing strategy systematically enhances them, amplifying and sharpening responses. Comparing the measured responses of L2 to model predictions across both artificial and natural stimuli revealed that L2 tunes its properties as the model predicts to temporally sharpen visual inputs. Since this strategy is tunable to behavioral context, generalizable to any time-varying sensory input, and implementable with a common circuit motif, we propose that it could be broadly used to selectively enhance sharp and salient changes.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterVision, OcularVisual PerceptionAnimalsPhotic StimulationPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateVisual PathwaysDrosophiladynamical modelingmotion blurrecurrent circuitrytemporal processingvisionvisual processingvoltage imaging

Identifiers

PMID39706173
PMCPMC11769683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.