ArticleParkinsonism & related disorders2025
Short-term cognitive practice effects in Parkinson's disease: More than meets the eye.
Article in Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough practice effects (PE) on repeated cognitive testing have received growing interest in Alzheimer's disease, they have been understudied in Parkinson's disease (PD). The current paper examined PE across one week in a sample of patients with PD via traditional methods and regression-based change scores, as well as if these change scores relate to clinical variables in PD.
methodsThirty-five patients with PD were administered a brief cognitive battery twice across approximately one week. Using both simple-difference and standardized regression-based change scores, a series of one-sample and independent t-tests were calculated to assess for PE across the test battery. Pearson correlations examined both types of change scores and measures of mood and severity of motor symptoms.
resultsWhereas traditional analyses (i.e., simple difference scores and dependent t-tests) did not reveal any changes on test scores over this interval, regression-based change scores did identify that these individuals showed significantly smaller-than-expected PE on three of the seven cognitive scores. Furthermore, when these regression-based change scores were trichotomized (decline/stable/improve), four of the seven tests showed significantly more decline than expected in this sample. Finally, these regression-based change scores significantly correlated with motor measures, with smaller PE being associated with worse motor functioning.
conclusionAlthough these results are preliminary and need to be replicated in larger and more diverse samples, smaller-than-expected PE are seen in PD and they may signal more advanced disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.